The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion (2024)

Title

The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion

Author

Joung, J.Y. (TU Delft OLD Design Theory and Methodology)
Badke-Schaub, P.G. (TU Delft OLD Design Theory and Methodology) The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion (1)

Date

2017

Abstract

Background Over the past decades a considerable number of studies have been done on the golden ratio and the relation between their aesthetics and design. These studies, after analyzing design icons with the golden ratio, seem to prove that the golden ratio is an important principle for good design. However, these studies mainly focused on western products that were used in western countries. And thus, the majority of the products were designed by western designers and analyzed by western scholars. These factors raised a doubt whether the golden ratio is also the most aesthetically pleasing proportion in other countries, for example in Asia. Proportions are determined by mathematical logic; however preference and aesthetic judgment are aroused from individual's experience and environmental context. Questioning whether the golden ratio is the most commonly preferred proportion across cultures led to an empirical study to examine the differences between Western and Asian preferences on the golden ratio. Specifically, this study is focused on Koreans' preference and their traditional products. Methods First, the preference experiment on proportion was conducted in South Korea with 277 subjects. Second, this study continued to analyze the proportion of over 100 Korean traditional objects that exemplify the research results. Results The experimental data clearly reveals that Korean subjects have a significant preference for the root ratio (1:1.414). This result obviously contradicts previous studies conducted in western countries that showed a strong preference for the golden ratio, and their good design objects are also characterized by the golden ratio (1:1.618). This study continues to verify that Koreans' favorite ratio could be found in Korean traditional design objects reflecting their preference. Korean traditional design objects show a clearly shorter ratio (1:1, 1:1.333) than the golden ratio (1:1.618). Conclusions It is concluded that the golden ratio is not always the best proportion for a good design, but it may be a preferred proportion since this ratio can be found in everyday objects as one of the predominant design features. Specifically, this finding will evoke deeper insights in the correlation of an influential impact between aesthetic preference and the element of design form and shape.


Subject

Cultural differences
Experimental aesthetics
Visual preference

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:429f9dc9-a479-4799-ab42-4a62f8a4bf8f

DOI

https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2017.11.30.4.5

ISSN

1226-8046

Source

Archives of Design Research, 30 (4), 5-14

Part of collection

Institutional Repository

Document type

journal article

Rights

© 2017 J.Y. Joung, P.G. Badke-Schaub

The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion (2024)

FAQs

The impact of aesthetic preference in product design-golden ratio and Korean's preference proportion? ›

The results show that Korean prefer the 7:10 rectangle the most (Figure 4) in contrast with the result of Fechner's experiment that significantly preferred the 5:8, the Golden ratio the most (Figure 1).

What is the golden ratio in Korean beauty standards? ›

Korean traditional design objects show a clearly shorter ratio (1:1, 1:1.333) than the golden ratio (1:1.618).

Why is the golden ratio aesthetically pleasing? ›

“The golden ratio is all about blank space and its relation to the 'pay attention' space,” says Berndt. “There's only so much that people can take visually. This is a guiding principle to help you understand the limits of human attention so you can create something that is aesthetically pleasing.”

What is the golden ratio for aesthetics? ›

If we measure the length and width of the face and then divide the length by the width, the ideal result – as defined by the Golden Ratio – is roughly 1.62. This number is known as Phi, after the Greek sculptor Phidias, who used this proportion in his work.

What is aesthetic preference? ›

Visual aesthetic preference refers to people selectively preferring certain visual stimuli that cause them to feel aesthetic pleasure [1]. For example, people tend to find symmetric human faces more attractive than less symmetric ones [2,3].

Why are Korean beauty standards so high? ›

Companies require a photo, height, and sometimes the family background of applicants as a part of the hiring process. Beauty is often seen as a means for socioeconomic success in the rapidly modernized post-war economy of South Korea, which has seen a sluggish job growth rate after its economic boom.

What is the golden ratio and proportions of beauty? ›

One concept that has repeatedly emerged as a consistent measure of beauty is the Golden Ratio, often referred to in the context of facial aesthetics as the Phi Ratio. This proportion, 1.618 to 1, is believed to provide the blueprint for what constitutes a harmoniously proportioned face.

What is the most aesthetically pleasing proportion? ›

In math, the ratio is 1:1.618, but let's not dwell on the numbers; let's look at how this mathematic relationship can improve and advance your art. Many artists, architects, and designers use the golden ratio in their work because it is considered to be the most aesthetically pleasing proportion.

Is the golden ratio the best way to measure whether a design is aesthetically pleasing? ›

There's no evidence that use of the golden ratio is better than use of other proportions, but artists and designers are always in the business of creating balance, order and interesting composition for their work.

What ratio appears to be aesthetically pleasing? ›

Golden ratio enthusiasts argue that the golden ratio is aesthetically pleasing because it's common in the natural world. The proportions of nautilus shells and human bodies are examples of the golden ratio in nature, but these tend to vary greatly from one individual to the next.

What is the most attractive golden ratio? ›

A visually balanced face is approximately 1.618 times longer than it is wide. The distance from the top of the nose to the center of the lips should be around 1.618 times the distance from the center of the lips to the chin.

Why is the golden ratio important in beauty? ›

The use of the Golden Ratio helps us to understand beauty and how to decipher it. The Golden Ratio can outline what the proportions of the face should be, including the length of facial structures e.g nose length / chin length in relation to other areas. This does not mean that all faces should look the same, however.

How do designers use the golden ratio? ›

The Golden Ratio can also be applied to typography to achieve the perfect balance in text sizing and arrangement. Start by choosing a dimension for your body text, then multiply it by 1.618 to get the size for your headlines.

What determines aesthetic preferences? ›

The two main factors that determine one's aesthetic are appearance and personal connections. As mentioned, appearances are what most people believe to be the only factor, but they are simply the outer shell to our preferences.

Does culture determine aesthetic preference? ›

Aesthetics refers to the study of beauty and taste, which are subjective oncepts influenced by cultural norms, traditions, and social experiences. People from different cultures have diverse perspectives on what is considered aesthetically pleasing or valuable.

What shapes our aesthetic preferences? ›

Aesthetic preferences are influenced by a variety of factors. Personality traits, such as openness to experience and mindfulness, have been found to play a role in shaping aesthetic preferences. Exposure to natural environments and specific geometric properties of natural scenes can also mediate aesthetic preferences.

Who has the highest Golden Ratio of beauty? ›

Conclusion. According to the Golden Ratio, a scientific measure of beauty, Jodie Comer is the world's most beautiful woman. Her face closely matches ideal proportions with a score of 94.52%.

What is the head to body ratio in Korean beauty standards? ›

If you take a look at photos of famous Korean celebrities, you'll see that most of them have tiny heads under big, bold hair. Ideally, the head to body ration is 1:8, which is a bit extreme for some, but in Korean beauty standards, it's what works. This applies to both men and women.

Who fit Korean beauty standards 100%? ›

South Korean pop stars like Kim Ji-soo (Blackpink), Irene (Red Velvet), Jin (BTS), and South Korean actresses such as Kim Tae-hee, Shin Min-ah, and Jun Ji-Hyun are some of the most admired South Korean stars solely because of their looks. What do they all have in common? They fit in the Korean beauty standards.

What is the Golden Ratio beauty score? ›

Some of the proportions they may discuss, as outlined by the Golden Ratio, include: A visually balanced face is approximately 1.618 times longer than it is wide. The distance from the top of the nose to the center of the lips should be around 1.618 times the distance from the center of the lips to the chin.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Terence Hammes MD

Last Updated:

Views: 5977

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Terence Hammes MD

Birthday: 1992-04-11

Address: Suite 408 9446 Mercy Mews, West Roxie, CT 04904

Phone: +50312511349175

Job: Product Consulting Liaison

Hobby: Jogging, Motor sports, Nordic skating, Jigsaw puzzles, Bird watching, Nordic skating, Sculpting

Introduction: My name is Terence Hammes MD, I am a inexpensive, energetic, jolly, faithful, cheerful, proud, rich person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.